Re: /bin/ksh not found
From: Valentin Nechayev (netch@segfault.kiev.ua)
Date: 04/22/03
- Next message: Mike Hastings: "Re: rm - Arguments too long"
- Previous message: Whoever: "Re: DHCP server - map to host names?"
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@segfault.kiev.ua> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:10:11 +0300
>>> Rich Teer wrote:
RT> That shouldn't matter as the / at the beginning means that a full
RT> pathname is being specified (properly called an absolute pathname).
RT> /bin/ksh (or /usr/bin/ksh) should be installed on just about
RT> any UNIX varient - which flavour are you using?
RT> You might be using something like Linux, which might not support
RT> ksh of the box. Linux != UNIX...
Unix is something which satisfies Single Unix Specification, current
version is number 3.
SUSv3 says nothing for ksh. It says only for sh, without exact path to it.
-netch-
- Next message: Mike Hastings: "Re: rm - Arguments too long"
- Previous message: Whoever: "Re: DHCP server - map to host names?"
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
