Re: /bin/ksh not found
From: Rich Teer (rich.teer@rite-group.com)
Date: 04/22/03
- Next message: Valentin Nechayev: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Previous message: Mike Hastings: "Re: rm - Arguments too long"
- In reply to: Valentin Nechayev: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: Derk Gwen: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Rich Teer <rich.teer@rite-group.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:04:31 GMT
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> Unix is something which satisfies Single Unix Specification, current
> version is number 3.
> SUSv3 says nothing for ksh. It says only for sh, without exact path to it.
I'm well aware of that! My point is that Linux has
incompatibilities with UNIX which, AFAIK, the Linux
community has no real intent on fixing, as they don't
deem it high priority. POSIX compliance would be a
good start (even an older version, like POSIX 1996).
-- Rich Teer, SCNA President, Rite Online Inc. Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-online.net
- Next message: Valentin Nechayev: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Previous message: Mike Hastings: "Re: rm - Arguments too long"
- In reply to: Valentin Nechayev: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: Derk Gwen: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
