Re: /bin/ksh not found
From: Valentin Nechayev (netch@segfault.kiev.ua)
Date: 04/22/03
- Previous message: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: Dragan Cvetkovic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Dragan Cvetkovic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Randal L. Schwartz: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@segfault.kiev.ua> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:05:13 +0300
>>> Rich Teer wrote:
>> Linux is just one of the many variations of unix that exist today.
RT> I don't want to turn this into a flame war, but all the time
RT> Linux is incapable of passing the UNIX certification tests
RT> (regardless of whether or not someone coughs up the cash to
RT> actually formally certify it), Linux != UNIX.
There is *NO* OS called "Linux".
-netch-
- Previous message: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: Dragan Cvetkovic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Dragan Cvetkovic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Randal L. Schwartz: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
