Re: Safe assumption that either www or public_html exists on *nix boxes?
From: jerrygarciuh (designs_at_no.spam.nolaflash.com)
Date: 11/10/03
- Previous message: raver: "Re: rsync -u and --ignore-existing options don't work"
- In reply to: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Safe assumption that either www or public_html exists on *nix boxes?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:50:46 -0600
Thanks.
jg
"those who know me have no need of my name" <not-a-real-address@usa.net>
wrote in message news:m1sml1axm5.gnus@usa.net...
> in comp.unix.misc i read:
>
> >My question to you is this: On posix compliant web server OSes is it a
safe
> >assumption that either public_html or www exist?
>
> no.
>
> --
> a signature
- Previous message: raver: "Re: rsync -u and --ignore-existing options don't work"
- In reply to: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Safe assumption that either www or public_html exists on *nix boxes?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
