Re: Can a shell be an "interpreter"?
From: those who know me have no need of my name (not-a-real-address_at_usa.net)
Date: 11/17/03
- Previous message: trifon: "Can a shell be an "interpreter"?"
- In reply to: trifon: "Can a shell be an "interpreter"?"
- Next in thread: Stephane CHAZELAS: "Re: Can a shell be an "interpreter"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 17 Nov 2003 09:32:29 GMT
in comp.unix.misc i read:
>#! /bin/bash,
>#! /bin/octave, etc. whatever "interpreter" specified on the first
>line. Is it possible the so called interpreter to be another script?
typically it is not allowed -- as you proved for yourself.
-- a signature
- Previous message: trifon: "Can a shell be an "interpreter"?"
- In reply to: trifon: "Can a shell be an "interpreter"?"
- Next in thread: Stephane CHAZELAS: "Re: Can a shell be an "interpreter"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]