Re: Why is SIGQUIT ignored by nohup?

From: Stephane CHAZELAS (this.address_at_is.invalid)
Date: 06/24/04 

Date: 24 Jun 2004 17:01:31 GMT

2004-06-24, 16:49(+00), Stephane CHAZELAS:
> does anybody know the historical reason why some implementations
> of nohup(1) ignore the SIGQUIT signal (in addition to SIGHUP)?
> No sensible reason comes to my mind to justify that behavior.
>
> (it's the case of Solaris nohup, at least)

[replying to myself]

As it seems, in Unix V4, signals 1, 2, 3 were ignored ("Nohup
executes /command/ with hangups, quits and interrupts all
ignored").

It seems to be "all the signals generated by the terminal" (at
that time, SIGTSTP, SIGTTOU, SIGTTIN didn't exist yet). 

-- 
Stephane