Re: double precise enough for unsigned short?

From: Eduardo Chappa (chappa@math.washington.edu)
Date: 04/04/03 

From: Eduardo Chappa <chappa@math.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:45:13 -0800

*** pete (pfiland@mindspring.com) wrote in comp.lang.c on Apr 1, 2003:

p> Eduardo Chappa wrote:
p>
p> > The point was to try to guess why some numbers have *finite*
p> > expansion in some bases while not in others.
p>
p> > I really mean it, try to leave mathematical statements for those that
p> > can formulate them precisely.
p>
p> OK, do it.

Left an an exercise to the reader. I am the grader :). 

-- 
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: double precise enough for unsigned short?
    ... Eduardo Chappa wrote: ... > Left an an exercise to the reader. ... I am the grader:). ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?
    ... forgot that this step is slightly tricky. ... Let's make this part of the exercise, ... vividly illustrates a slightly scary aspect of perturbation expansions. ... your result (or the expansion above) and see if you spot something ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
    ... of expansion. ... Not some half-assed reporter. ... Unlike you, Henry, I exercise some caution in which materials to refer ... to for reliable information. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)