Re: conf files.
From: Måns Rullgård (mru_at_users.sourceforge.net)
Date: 04/28/03
- Previous message: Mohun Biswas: "Re: conf files."
- In reply to: Mohun Biswas: "Re: conf files."
- Next in thread: Barry Margolin: "Re: conf files."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 Apr 2003 03:42:45 +0200
Mohun Biswas <not_here@spam.me.not> writes:
> Any comparison data vs the balanced-tree implementation in GLib
> (e.g. http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-Balanced-Binary-Trees.html)?
> Or was Måns's reference to 'glibc' a typo?
I took it from glibc, with a 'c'. I did it long before glib2 was
released. Btw, why is glib's linked list so dreadful? Try appending
100000 elements to a list and watch the quadratic time.
-- Måns Rullgård mru@users.sf.net
- Previous message: Mohun Biswas: "Re: conf files."
- In reply to: Mohun Biswas: "Re: conf files."
- Next in thread: Barry Margolin: "Re: conf files."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|