Re: threads vs. processes
From: Rich Teer (rich.teer_at_rite-group.com)
Date: 05/03/03
- Next message: Ed L Cashin: "Re: threads vs. processes"
- Previous message: Barry Margolin: "Re: threads vs. processes"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: threads vs. processes"
- Next in thread: Ed L Cashin: "Re: threads vs. processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 01:17:02 GMT
On Fri, 2 May 2003, David Schwartz wrote:
> > > There will soon be a third edition. It will be perfect. ;)
> > >
> > > DS
>
> > You must be joking.
>
> I am not joking. I'm reviewing the draft. In the 150 pages I've reviewed
> so far, my complaints fit comfortably in a paragraph.
Ah. In that case, I think you meant third volume, not
third edition?
-- Rich Teer, SCNA President, Rite Online Inc. Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-online.net
- Next message: Ed L Cashin: "Re: threads vs. processes"
- Previous message: Barry Margolin: "Re: threads vs. processes"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: threads vs. processes"
- Next in thread: Ed L Cashin: "Re: threads vs. processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]