Re: 4GB VM for 32 bit processes
From: Loic Domaigne (loic-dev_at_gmx.net)
Date: 08/28/03
- Next message: Loic Domaigne: "Re: [OT] Re: Open Source -> Unemployment"
- Previous message: Douwe: "Re: [OT] Re: Open Source -> Unemployment"
- In reply to: Manish Baronia: "Re: 4GB VM for 32 bit processes"
- Next in thread: Manish Baronia: "Re: 4GB VM for 32 bit processes"
- Reply: Manish Baronia: "Re: 4GB VM for 32 bit processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 28 Aug 2003 07:52:04 +0000
Hi!
> Thanks Jerry, Casper, Loic, Eric,
You're welcome!
> The answers do give me insight of memory management. Does
> getrlimit(RLIMIT_AS, &rlimit) ; rlimit.rlim_max returns me correct user
> area value(According to kernel parameters)?
If you mean e.g. that the user-space/kernel-space splitting is token into
account, I doubt! Indeed RLIM_INFINITY could be returned. I'm not sure if
the meaning of RLIM_INFINITY is the same on all implementations.
For instance, on Linux, you can get RLIM_INFINITY, although the answer is
really 3G assuming a 3G-1G splitting. I don't know if that particular
getrlimit() implementation is conform to SUS, but I would think so.
Cheers,
Loic.
-- Article posté via l'accès Usenet http://www.mes-news.com Accès par Nnrp ou Web
- Next message: Loic Domaigne: "Re: [OT] Re: Open Source -> Unemployment"
- Previous message: Douwe: "Re: [OT] Re: Open Source -> Unemployment"
- In reply to: Manish Baronia: "Re: 4GB VM for 32 bit processes"
- Next in thread: Manish Baronia: "Re: 4GB VM for 32 bit processes"
- Reply: Manish Baronia: "Re: 4GB VM for 32 bit processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]