Re: exit()
From: Kenny McCormack (gazelle_at_yin.interaccess.com)
Date: 09/30/03
- Next message: Chuck Dillon: "Re: Controlling an Xterm from a C++ Program"
- Previous message: Gerd Moellmann: "Re: Controlling an Xterm from a C++ Program"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: exit()"
- Next in thread: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: exit()"
- Reply: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: exit()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:14:16 GMT
In article <bla8na$hif$1@nntp.webmaster.com>,
David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> wrote:
>
>"Christopher Benson-Manica" <ataru@nospam.cyberspace.org> wrote in message
>news:bla33j$1ac$1@chessie.cirr.com...
>
>> The man page for exit() claims that it ends the current process.
>> Does it really mean the process (i.e., the current execution
>> context/thread and all associated contexts/threads) or just the
>> current execution context?
>
> It means the current process, including all associated threads.
>
> DS
>
>
Are we assuming that by "current execution context", the OP means "thread"?
(And if so, why he not just say so?)
- Next message: Chuck Dillon: "Re: Controlling an Xterm from a C++ Program"
- Previous message: Gerd Moellmann: "Re: Controlling an Xterm from a C++ Program"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: exit()"
- Next in thread: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: exit()"
- Reply: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: exit()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]