Re: How To Do Single Step debugging Under Sparc
From: Norman Black (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 11/07/03
- Next message: Barry Margolin: "Re: Trying to set up a SED script..."
- Previous message: Bruce Esquibel: "Re: History of gettext() et al?"
- In reply to: xtaci: "Re: How To Do Single Step debugging Under Sparc"
- Next in thread: xtaci: "Re: How To Do Single Step debugging Under Sparc"
- Reply: xtaci: "Re: How To Do Single Step debugging Under Sparc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:22:13 GMT
> i forget to add poll in the while
> but it still very slow.
> it cost me 30seconds to finish a ls command.
Yes, controlling a process is slow. If you are stepping by single
instruction when think of the amount of code that must be executed
(yours and the OS receiving/executing your commands) just to control the
process and the process in only going to execute one instruction.
-- Norman Black Stony Brook Software "xtaci" <xtaci@163.com> wrote in message news:bog46l$q4m$1@mail.cn99.com... > xtaci wrote: > > forget about last post. > > i forget to add poll in the while > but it still very slow. > it cost me 30seconds to finish a ls command. >
- Next message: Barry Margolin: "Re: Trying to set up a SED script..."
- Previous message: Bruce Esquibel: "Re: History of gettext() et al?"
- In reply to: xtaci: "Re: How To Do Single Step debugging Under Sparc"
- Next in thread: xtaci: "Re: How To Do Single Step debugging Under Sparc"
- Reply: xtaci: "Re: How To Do Single Step debugging Under Sparc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
