Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process

From: Ben (crescent_au_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/16/04 

Date: 15 Mar 2004 20:22:33 -0800

Jack Klein <jackklein@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:<92f78472096097df4441459128d7666f@news.teranews.com>...
>
> Why did you cross-post this to comp.lang.c, where it is completely
> off-topic?

well, my reason for posting it in c.l.c is:

C is a fairly popular language and i guessed most concurrent and
parallel programming has been done in C. So I thought C programmers
are one group of people who may have good understanding of these
topics. I could be wrong in thinking this but that's what i thought
when I posted. Lets not take it seriously. If you think it's been
off-topic, just ignore it...

Thanx for replies!
Ben

Relevant Pages

  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process
    ... > Why did you cross-post this to comp.lang.c, ... my reason for posting it in c.l.c is: ... parallel programming has been done in C. So I thought C programmers ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process
    ... > Why did you cross-post this to comp.lang.c, ... my reason for posting it in c.l.c is: ... parallel programming has been done in C. So I thought C programmers ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: functions pointer
    ... you should cross-post rather than posting ... individually to each newsgroup. ... Even if you had a good reason for posting to multiple groups, ...
    (comp.std.c)