Re: Shared memory and semaphore synchonization
From: Barry Margolin (barmar_at_alum.mit.edu)
Date: 04/22/04
- Next message: Reinhard Eilmsteiner: "Re: using PAM for authentication"
- Previous message: William Ahern: "Re: using PAM for authentication"
- In reply to: Jem Berkes: "Re: Shared memory and semaphore synchonization"
- Next in thread: Doug Ly: "Re: Shared memory and semaphore synchonization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:45:06 -0400
In article <Xns94D372AF7C880jbuserspc9org@130.179.16.24>,
Jem Berkes <jb@users.pc9.org> wrote:
> > please advice me if this sync. is correct .
> > Thanks a lot.
>
> Many people don't consider this kind of thing appropriate for newsgroups
> such as this one. "Here's my attempt at homework -- check it over for me".
Actually, what we don't like is when someone doesn't ask specific
questions, or asks us to just write the code for them. Even worse is
when they don't admit that it's an assignment, as if we can't recognize
them on sight.
But if he's written code and just wants some advice, most of us are
comfortable with it. It shows that he's made an effort.
-- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
- Next message: Reinhard Eilmsteiner: "Re: using PAM for authentication"
- Previous message: William Ahern: "Re: using PAM for authentication"
- In reply to: Jem Berkes: "Re: Shared memory and semaphore synchonization"
- Next in thread: Doug Ly: "Re: Shared memory and semaphore synchonization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
