Re: Base class and OOP in C
From: Paul Pluzhnikov (ppluzhnikov-nsp_at_charter.net)
Date: 03/29/05
- Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Base class and OOP in C"
- In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Base class and OOP in C"
- Next in thread: jonathon: "Re: Base class and OOP in C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:34:23 -0800
Måns Rullgård <mru@inprovide.com> writes:
> If you change your declarations slightly, it will work:
This is the answer to the question OP didn't ask ("Why doesn't my
scheme work?"), but not to the question he did ask:
>> I want the derived modules to link with the base library, so that my
>> application can link with only the derived modules and still be able
>> to call the base functions without having to link to that library or
>> call 'wrapper' functions in the derived modules.
>>
>> Is there a way to do this?
Yes if both base and derived are built as shared libraries;
otherwise no.
For the shared library case, simply link derived against base:
gcc -shared -o libbase.so base*.o
gcc -shared -o libderived.so derived*.o -L. -lbase
gcc main.c -L. -lderived # -lbase is "automagically" linked
Cheers,
-- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. Remove /-nsp/ for email.
- Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Base class and OOP in C"
- In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: Base class and OOP in C"
- Next in thread: jonathon: "Re: Base class and OOP in C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]