Re: Why cannot truss peek inside sendmsg()
From: Casper H.S. Dik (Casper.Dik_at_Sun.COM)
Date: 04/30/05
- Next message: Scott Howard: "Re: Why cannot truss peek inside sendmsg()"
- Previous message: Bill Marcum: "Re: units"
- In reply to: Jonathan Adams: "Re: Why cannot truss peek inside sendmsg()"
- Next in thread: Scott Howard: "Re: Why cannot truss peek inside sendmsg()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Apr 2005 08:42:22 GMT
Jonathan Adams <jwadams@gmail.com> writes:
>In article <1114659765.003725.136730@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> sonyantony@hotmail.com wrote:
>> Jonathan Adams wrote:
>> >
>> > Not really; the code to do it was just never written. I've filed
>> >
>> > 6262586 truss should print data written/read for sendmsg/recvmsg
>> >
>> > to cover this.
>>
>> dtrace sounds promising. Is dtrace available on solaris 8 ?
>Nope; and it will never be available for Solaris 8 -- it relies on type
>infrastructure that was introduced in Solaris 9. (it's not likely to be
>backported to S9, either)
Isn't it the case that it can't be made on sun4m CPUs either?
(Or only with great difficulty?)
Casper
-- Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems. Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may be fiction rather than truth.
- Next message: Scott Howard: "Re: Why cannot truss peek inside sendmsg()"
- Previous message: Bill Marcum: "Re: units"
- In reply to: Jonathan Adams: "Re: Why cannot truss peek inside sendmsg()"
- Next in thread: Scott Howard: "Re: Why cannot truss peek inside sendmsg()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]