Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry
From: Mike Meyer (mwm_at_mired.org)
Date: 10/09/05
- Next message: Mike Meyer: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- Previous message: Steven D'Aprano: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- In reply to: Roedy Green: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- Next in thread: Roedy Green: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- Reply: Roedy Green: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 06:32:07 -0400
Roedy Green <my_email_is_posted_on_my_website@munged.invalid> writes:
> There is no fundamental reason that formatted spam should have an
> easier time penetrating your defenses than plain text spam.
Formatted spam can include pictures of words. That's a common spam
tactic - send a multipart/alternative with a text part that look like
a letter from aunt jane - and mention that you're sending a
picture. The picture part is basically a jpeg of a flyer for the spam
companies product.
If you've got a spam filter that can determine that a picture of words
is spam, I'd like to know about it.
<mike
-- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
- Next message: Mike Meyer: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- Previous message: Steven D'Aprano: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- In reply to: Roedy Green: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- Next in thread: Roedy Green: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- Reply: Roedy Green: "Re: Jargons of Info Tech industry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|