Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

From: Roedy Green (my_email_is_posted_on_my_website_at_munged.invalid)
Date: 10/27/05


Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:15:03 GMT

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:50:07 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who
said :

> There is no different to Microsoft beween a bare computer and one
>preloaded with Linux or FreeBSD. One can quickly be converted to other with
>minimal cost of effort. In the market, bare PCs really do compete with
>Windows PCs.

You think it is OK to force someone into a choice of committing a
criminal act with the alternative of losing their established business
and having to put 8 employees out of work. What religion do you belong
to?

-- 
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ
    ... >preloaded with Linux or FreeBSD. ... >minimal cost of effort. ... bare PCs really do compete with ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ
    ... >> preloaded with Linux or FreeBSD. ... In the market, bare PCs really do ... >> compete with Windows PCs. ... recent Linux desktop builds as desktops. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ
    ... >> preloaded with Linux or FreeBSD. ... In the market, bare PCs really do ... >> compete with Windows PCs. ... recent Linux desktop builds as desktops. ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ
    ... > There is no different to Microsoft beween a bare computer and one ... > preloaded with Linux or FreeBSD. ... bare PCs really do compete ... reasons Linux has had a reputation of being harder to use than Windows was ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ
    ... > There is no different to Microsoft beween a bare computer and one ... > preloaded with Linux or FreeBSD. ... bare PCs really do compete ... reasons Linux has had a reputation of being harder to use than Windows was ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)