Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler
From: Alex Colvin (alexc_at_TheWorld.com)
Date: 10/28/05
- Next message: joe_at_invalid.address: "Re: Mysterious file descriptor behavior"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ"
- In reply to: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Steven G. Kargl: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:29:41 +0000 (UTC)
>I think the main reason there's no BSD C/C++ compiler is that the
>GNU "C/C++" compiler is "good enough".
I think another reason is that C++ has grown so that writing a C++
compiler ab initio is no longer practical.
According to the comp.compilers archives,
>Just a word of warning. Walter Bright, who implemented an early C++ compiler, had this to say in comp.lang.c++.moderated recently:
>>"I'd venture that it would take 10 years to write a C++ compiler from scratch."
-- mac the naïf
- Next message: joe_at_invalid.address: "Re: Mysterious file descriptor behavior"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ"
- In reply to: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Steven G. Kargl: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]