Re: Mysterious file descriptor behavior
From: Alex Fraser (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 10/29/05
- Next message: William Ahern: "Re: Mysterious file descriptor behavior"
- Previous message: Mike Meyer: "Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ"
- In reply to: joe_at_invalid.address: "Re: Mysterious file descriptor behavior"
- Next in thread: Jordan Abel: "Re: Mysterious file descriptor behavior"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:05:16 +0100
<joe@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:m3r7a54b7h.fsf@invalid.address...
> "Alex Fraser" <me@privacy.net> writes:
[snip]
> > No, I'm saying it need not conform to any standard because it is the
> > shell's business what fds it has open.
>
> Ok, that's what I was saying. I thought you were objecting to
> something I said.
You said, "Descriptor 255 isn't standard, it depends on the system...". I
figured you hadn't realised it depends specifically on the shell.
Alex
- Next message: William Ahern: "Re: Mysterious file descriptor behavior"
- Previous message: Mike Meyer: "Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ"
- In reply to: joe_at_invalid.address: "Re: Mysterious file descriptor behavior"
- Next in thread: Jordan Abel: "Re: Mysterious file descriptor behavior"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|