Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler
From: David Schwartz (davids_at_webmaster.com)
Date: 11/09/05
- Next message: David Schwartz: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Previous message: David Schwartz: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- In reply to: Richard Tobin: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Richard Tobin: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Reply: Richard Tobin: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:35:17 -0800
"Richard Tobin" <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:dkram3$njb$3@pc-news.cogsci.ed.ac.uk...
> No, but it means there may be works derived from yours that you and
> others can't use. That can't happen with the GPL.
Really?! So the GPL requires that all derived works to be made available
to the original authors? What clause in the GPL says that?
DS
- Next message: David Schwartz: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Previous message: David Schwartz: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- In reply to: Richard Tobin: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Richard Tobin: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Reply: Richard Tobin: "Re: BSD Licensed C++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]