Re: large file support && ! large file support
- From: phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 22 May 2007 12:23:42 GMT
On Mon, 21 May 2007 20:55:29 -0700 Frank Cusack <fcusack@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| On 21 May 2007 22:43:27 GMT phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx wrote:
|> No, I certainly do not have that legacy. But even if I did I would not
|> take the approach POSIX LFS did. I would want to make it work for both
|> old and new programs, even if that meant having 2 or even 3 different
|> binary libraries (at least one being there for legacy ABI compatibility
|> for programs w/o source code available).
|
| That's nice on paper but really most software developers aren't that good
| and changing the default (to be LFS-ok) would IMHO have been a big problem.
| I can see even just requiring a re-link against a non-LFS library to be
| problematic.
|
| Anyway, I'll be very interested to hear of your solution.
My solution as I would have done POSIX LFS, or my solution for my libraries?
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2007-05-22-0723@xxxxxxxx |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: large file support && ! large file support
- From: Frank Cusack
- Re: large file support && ! large file support
- References:
- large file support && ! large file support
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: large file support && ! large file support
- From: Frank Cusack
- Re: large file support && ! large file support
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: large file support && ! large file support
- From: Frank Cusack
- Re: large file support && ! large file support
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: large file support && ! large file support
- From: Frank Cusack
- Re: large file support && ! large file support
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: large file support && ! large file support
- From: Frank Cusack
- large file support && ! large file support
- Prev by Date: Re: gcc: extract function prototypes
- Next by Date: Re: ExecV()
- Previous by thread: Re: large file support && ! large file support
- Next by thread: Re: large file support && ! large file support
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|