Re: Compile differences between Linux and FreeBSD
- From: vippstar@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 24, 12:24 am, Rex Mottram <r...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Doug McIntyre wrote:Or use the simple standard procedure of compiling the code.
drhowarddrfine <robbel...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
I compiled this little program with Knoppix and it worked but I'm
still wondering if anyone would know of a workaround so I don't have
to run to a Linux boxevery time.
Linux and FreeBSD in general aren't binary comptible.
Actually FreeBSD has a feature such that it can run Linux binaries (a
kernel module that remaps the system call vector or some such). But
there's no such thing in reverse. Thus it might be easiest to compile on
Linux and run on either. Or to develop in Java :-)
Stick to POSIX and it shouldn't matter whether you compile on freebsd
or linux or hp-ux.
It will also most likely run on more exotic systems than what Java can
afford.
.
- References:
- Compile differences between Linux and FreeBSD
- From: drhowarddrfine
- Re: Compile differences between Linux and FreeBSD
- From: drhowarddrfine
- Re: Compile differences between Linux and FreeBSD
- From: Doug McIntyre
- Re: Compile differences between Linux and FreeBSD
- From: Rex Mottram
- Compile differences between Linux and FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: Bit bucket directory
- Next by Date: Re: example of .journal file
- Previous by thread: Re: Compile differences between Linux and FreeBSD
- Next by thread: Re: Compile differences between Linux and FreeBSD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
