Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be

From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:24:18 +0200

James Kanze <james.kanze@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Jul 21, 1:14 pm, Don Morris <dgmor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

James Kanze wrote:

[...]

Is nothing. I haven't complained about anything. Except one
person's presentation of one particular model (that used in
single thread applications on Solaris, and I think Linux) as if
it were universal.

This one person's name is James Kanze.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
  - From: Rainer Weikusat

References:
- how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
  - From: viza
- Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
  - From: Rainer Weikusat
- Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
  - From: James Kanze
- Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
  - From: Don Morris
- Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
  - From: James Kanze
- Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
  - From: Don Morris
- Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
  - From: James Kanze

Prev by Date: Re: Problem with read(2) and pseudo-terminals
Next by Date: gdb vs fortran RTL -- fight for SIGSEGV
Previous by thread: Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
Next by thread: Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: how big can automatic (stack) arrays be
... James Kanze wrote: ... single thread applications on Solaris, and I think Linux) as if ...
(comp.unix.programmer)
Re: editor that has multi file search/replace?
... James Kanze wrote: ... I do use less and cat as well to just read. ... I have it at my linux at least: ... Tobias Brox, 69°42'N, 18°57'E ...
(comp.os.linux.misc)