Re: epoll and multiple UDP multicast streams
- From: Barry Margolin <barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:14:30 -0500
In article
<b4d6443f-b987-45e5-b55d-733c41962d7c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
george13p@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,
If I subscribe to multiple, very active, multicast groups is there any
kind of starvation?
let say there are the following streams : A,B,C and D and I receive
data continuously
using epoll for finding the ready descriptors would there be a round
robin like read from the sockets or all the packets from A's buffer
and then B/C/D buffer etc?
thanks,
If data is being received on all the sockets continuously, epoll()
should tell you that all of them are ready to read. If you read from
all the sockets that are ready, there won't be any starvation.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: epoll and multiple UDP multicast streams
- From: george13p
- Re: epoll and multiple UDP multicast streams
- References:
- epoll and multiple UDP multicast streams
- From: george13p
- epoll and multiple UDP multicast streams
- Prev by Date: Re: white space problem in argument to system()
- Next by Date: Re: epoll and multiple UDP multicast streams
- Previous by thread: Re: epoll and multiple UDP multicast streams
- Next by thread: Re: epoll and multiple UDP multicast streams
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|