'Path for the shared libraries which I do not have direct dependency' also in LD_LIBRARY_PATH
From: qazmlp (qazmlp1209_at_rediffmail.com)
Date: 03/24/04
- Previous message: Birger Blixt: "Re: Dumb question: How do I kill a ping?"
- Next in thread: Chuck Dillon: "Re: 'Path for the shared libraries which I do not have direct dependency' also in LD_LIBRARY_PATH"
- Reply: Chuck Dillon: "Re: 'Path for the shared libraries which I do not have direct dependency' also in LD_LIBRARY_PATH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 24 Mar 2004 05:17:10 -0800
I have a shared library libFirst.so
I have a shared library libSecond.so which has dependency libFirst.so.
Hence, while producing the libSecond.so, I have to add the path to
libFirst.so
in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
I have a shared library libThird.so which has dependency only on
libSecond.so.
So, I mentioned the path to only libSecond.so in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
while producing
libThird.so.
But, the linker reports error pointing at the symbols in libFirst.so
After adding the path to libFirst.so also in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, the
error disappears.
I am wondering why such a requirement of adding the path of some other
shared libraries also is required when my library libThird.so does not
have a direct dependency on them.
Kindly clarify!
- Previous message: Birger Blixt: "Re: Dumb question: How do I kill a ping?"
- Next in thread: Chuck Dillon: "Re: 'Path for the shared libraries which I do not have direct dependency' also in LD_LIBRARY_PATH"
- Reply: Chuck Dillon: "Re: 'Path for the shared libraries which I do not have direct dependency' also in LD_LIBRARY_PATH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|