Re: /usr/local/
From: Peter J. Acklam (pjacklam_at_online.no)
Date: 03/30/04
- Previous message: Nick Landsberg: "Re: Do too many files hurt a directory?"
- In reply to: Michael Tosch: "Re: /usr/local/"
- Next in thread: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: /usr/local/"
- Reply: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: /usr/local/"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Mar 2004 08:07:17 +0200
eedmit@NO.eed.SPAM.ericsson.PLS.se (Michael Tosch) wrote:
> /usr/local has never been part of Solaris. Sun Solaris has
> preferred /opt in the beginning. Today Sun has rediscovered
> /usr, and now preferres directories like /usr/sfw.
What version of Solaris uses /usr/sfw? Solaris 10? I work with
computers running Solaris 2.3, 2.5, 2.6, 7, 8, and 9 and I can't
remember once having seen software under /use/sfw. My workstation
running Solaris 9 has optional software in /opt/sfw.
Peter
-- Peter J. Acklam - pjacklam@online.no - http://home.online.no/~pjacklam
- Previous message: Nick Landsberg: "Re: Do too many files hurt a directory?"
- In reply to: Michael Tosch: "Re: /usr/local/"
- Next in thread: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: /usr/local/"
- Reply: Alan Coopersmith: "Re: /usr/local/"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
