Re: /usr/local/
From: Alan Coopersmith (alanc_at_alum.calberkeley.org)
Date: 03/31/04
- Next message: Barry Margolin: "Re: Trouble with UNIX pipes"
- Previous message: Gergely Korodi: "Trouble with UNIX pipes"
- In reply to: Peter J. Acklam: "Re: /usr/local/"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:52:02 +0000 (UTC)
pjacklam@online.no (Peter J. Acklam) writes in comp.unix.questions:
|What version of Solaris uses /usr/sfw? Solaris 10? I work with
|computers running Solaris 2.3, 2.5, 2.6, 7, 8, and 9 and I can't
|remember once having seen software under /use/sfw. My workstation
|running Solaris 9 has optional software in /opt/sfw.
Solaris 9 & 10 both do if you do a full installation. /usr/sfw contains
the additional freeware tools included on the OS CD - /opt/sfw is the
software from the separate companion CD. (The Solaris distinction is
that software that comes on the OS CD's belongs in /usr, that which
does not usually goes into /opt.)
-- ________________________________________________________________________ Alan Coopersmith alanc@alum.calberkeley.org http://www.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU/~alanc/ aka: Alan.Coopersmith@Sun.COM Working for, but definitely not speaking for, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
- Next message: Barry Margolin: "Re: Trouble with UNIX pipes"
- Previous message: Gergely Korodi: "Trouble with UNIX pipes"
- In reply to: Peter J. Acklam: "Re: /usr/local/"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|