Re: SCO UNIX v/386 RELEASE 3.2 version 2.0
From: Bill Marcum (bmarcum_at_iglou.com.urgent)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: Bill Marcum: "Re: a two-level 'sort' question"
- Previous message: subPlanck_at_excite.com: "Re: a two-level 'sort' question"
- In reply to: AT&T_RETRO: "SCO UNIX v/386 RELEASE 3.2 version 2.0"
- Next in thread: AT&T_RETRO: "Re: SCO UNIX v/386 RELEASE 3.2 version 2.0"
- Reply: AT&T_RETRO: "Re: SCO UNIX v/386 RELEASE 3.2 version 2.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:58:21 -0500
On 29 Mar 2005 08:29:14 -0800, AT&T_RETRO
<tatum_mi@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hello All,
> I purchased this package a year or so back, It seems the n3 & n4 disks
> are missing. Is there a workaround that anyone knows of? I have the
> complete documentation except it it is missing two disk out of the set.
>
Contact SCO, if they are not too busy with their lawsuits.
-- "I deleted a file from my PC last week and I have just realized that I need it. If I turn my system clock back two weeks will I have my file back again?"
- Next message: Bill Marcum: "Re: a two-level 'sort' question"
- Previous message: subPlanck_at_excite.com: "Re: a two-level 'sort' question"
- In reply to: AT&T_RETRO: "SCO UNIX v/386 RELEASE 3.2 version 2.0"
- Next in thread: AT&T_RETRO: "Re: SCO UNIX v/386 RELEASE 3.2 version 2.0"
- Reply: AT&T_RETRO: "Re: SCO UNIX v/386 RELEASE 3.2 version 2.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|