Re: New to Unix

From: jpd (read_the_sig_at_do.not.spam.it.invalid)
Date: 10/22/05


Date: 22 Oct 2005 21:01:05 GMT

Begin <w2v6f.35903$Z8.23577@read2.cgocable.net>
On 2005-10-22, Neb <neb.radojkovic@gmail.com> wrote:
> I imagine that this question was asked a million times...
> I would like to learn (as much as possible) about Unix.
> Where do I start?

A good book.

For example, I heard good things about:

  http://www.ora.com/catalog/lunix5

Do remember that unices are extremely powerful tools that lack a lot of
the padding (of the kind found in padded rooms) that windows features.
So you do need to invest a bit in knowning how it works. Installing it
for the first time may not be as easy as installing windows.

> What would be the best Unix System for me to start
> with? I am a many years Windows user and would like to get away from
> MS...

I could mention widely used unix-like[1] systems that can be had for
free[2], but which one is best for you I will leave as an excercise.

Technically, linux in itself is not a complete OS, but many people have
packed it up with all the tools you need it to make it more or less
complete, and this is called a ``linux distribution''. The ubuntu and
gentoo distributions seem to be widely popular, lately. If you like
windows-like installation menus fedora (previously redhat) or suse might
suit your tastes better, but you said you wanted to get away from that.

Not as widely known as linux are the descendants of BSD, to wit:
FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD. These are true un*x derived OSen whereas
linux is rewritten from scratch. The results are high-quality and
stable software. FreeBSD is what I use for my daily workhorse, altough
the others I have used and on occasion still do use. The differences
between the three on intel hardware are mostly a taste issue, but
especially NetBSD supports a much wider range of hardware, from old
VAXen through suns, macintoshes and acorns to embedded systems and pdas.
FreeBSD/i386 and NetBSD/i386 can also run linux/i386 binaries if you add
the apropriate libraries, making things like skype and acrobat reader
also available. I would recommend FreeBSD for an easy start, as it has
the largest collection of applications (``ports'') of the three, and
high quality documentation.

[1] Technical term, has to do with ``unix'' being a trademark.
[2] Downloaded off the internet. If you want it on CD either download
    iso images and burn, or buy a cd-set, which at least in the *BSD
    cases includes a small donation to the volunteer project that
    maintains the OS.

-- 
  j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .


Relevant Pages

  • Re: free vs commercial
    ... > comparing the Linux I had installed with WinXP. ... think we as a whole would acknowledge the warts Debian and Linux have but I ... Installing my suite of software on Windows requires a CD-R ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: wine
    ... > results to running in linux and windows. ... > performance gap in freebsd. ... The linux version under redhat 9 gives me a better framerate ... Its a shame we can't get native games for freebsd. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • RE: BSD Questions.
    ... >Cc: Daniel A.; Andy Sjostrom ... >>> I suggest that you use Linux, as FreeBSD ... >>> replacement for Windows, as they somehow have ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: HELP!! Dual monitors - Primary shuts off when mouse moves off it!
    ... I start to miss my Windows ... when installing new ... > This isn't to say that I don't absolutely love Linux. ... Yes, lack of support. ...
    (alt.linux)
  • Re: Is Zotob A MS Plot . . . .
    ... Problem is the simple Wintards around here are too busy sucking ... all that is required to have no problems running hardware under Linux. ... all Windows machines slowly degenerate over time. ... first thing to do after installing is to visit http://easyurpmi.zarb.org/ ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)