Re: How to add two 3c905-tx cards?

From: FyRE (FyRE_at_toktik.demon.ku.oc.x)
Date: 09/25/03


Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:22:44 +0100

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:27:05 +0200, Roberto Zini <rob@robnothere.com>
wrote:

[...]

>Please understand: I'm __NOT__ against Linux as well as I'm __NOT__
>against SCO (we made our living selling SCO's products since 1986) and
>I've got a great respect for all the efforts people put into this
>newsgroup daily.

If you're actually supporting SCO then you are at best extremely
naive! Can you not see that the management of the company you are
blindly suporting has absolutely no interest in you, or any other
vendor? They are actively killing your revenue stream with their
actions.

I can see why you would try to put on a brave face in front of
customers, since you are, after all, making money by giving them a
very very bad deal, but I'm surprised you're actually trying to fool a
technical newsgroup with this charade.

>It's only that I don't like comments like yours, which reminds me of
>"Your system sucks; mine is better" threads I've seen in other newsgroups.

I'm not claiming any other particular system is "better". Although SCO
is the worst option for virtually anything these days. Do you actually
feel *good* after convincing some company to pay ludicrous amounts of
money for a dead OS, which is vastly out-performed by the competition?
It reminds me of the news stories of travelling criminals who fool
little old ladies into paying all their life savings to have their
(perfectly good) roof tiles replaced. In short, advising anyone to buy
SCO software is unethical and possibly unlawful (as SCO continue to
distribute their software with lots of GPL'ed code although they claim
the GPL is illegal).

>You're against SCO, this is your opinion and a big "thank you" for
>letting us know about that is in order;

Not just me, Roberto. I'm a member of a community, and unless you've
been living under a rock (along with McBride and his cohorts, one
presumes) you'll realise SCO have enraged a huge number of people, and
companies. The fact they've been contributing to open source projects,
yet now claim the community have "stolen" from them, the fact they
refuse to provide ANY evidence of this theft, the blatant stock price
manipulation, the daily lies to the more gullible members of the
media... etc... etc... etc...

>I'm part of this world, I'm not
>against SCO (at the moment :-) so your second statement is simply not
>true (which makes 2 in a single post, nice one :-).

The second statement is far closer to the truth than you probably like
to admit to yourself. SCO are second only to Microsoft in the opinion
of most of the open source world. They are the worst type of corporate
scum, trying to ride the coat-tails of a successful operating system
(Linux) by leeching off of its users after their own market has
failed.

>Now, if you want to actively contribute to the group, be my guest: if
>not, well, stick to something else.

So I should ask YOUR permission before posting? Only messages
containing grovelling praise for SCO maybe? Sorry Roberto, but you
can't bury your head in the sand here. This is a public forum and I'm
entitled to my opinion, no matter what happens in your country...

-- 
FyRE < "War: The way Americans learn geography" >


Relevant Pages

  • Re: FyRE, Im Curious About You Too...
    ... you have a political opinion that open source is ... >software for which better, open source alternatives exist. ... >and configure a SCO product, even if they wrote decent software. ... I advise my customers to be aware of available alternatives, ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: FyRE, Im Curious About You Too...
    ... >>That experience polarized my opinion of proprietary OS' so much that I ... you have a political opinion that open source is ... developing a "group chat" system using java and a proprietory back-end ... and configure a SCO product, even if they wrote decent software. ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: SCO now turning on their own dwindling customer base...
    ... And how does this hurt SCO? ... OpenServer business depends on open source or things like Samba (how useful ... installed base of SMB customers much more than it does SCO, ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: No longer supporting Unixware / Open Server
    ... By "you guys" I meant you SCO keeners. ... Anybody is welcome to deploy open source software and change it to their ... GPL, you do not have a license to distribute GPLed software - simple as ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: SCO vs GPL????
    ... Ten or twenty million is pocket change to Bill and the ... >stagger, the open source juggernaut. ... if SCO really ...I mean ... >I think Bill would've bought SCO and their Unix copyrights in a ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)