Re: "Mad" Tony...
tony_at_aplawrence.com
Date: 10/30/03
- Next message: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: "Mad" Tony..."
- Previous message: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: SCO attacks GPL"
- In reply to: Tom Felker: "Re: "Mad" Tony..."
- Next in thread: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: "Mad" Tony..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:15:27 +0000 (UTC)
Tom Felker <tcfelker@mtco.com> wrote:
>I don't think copyright law is so difficult to understand, though. And to
>the extent that it is, it shouldn't be - one of the basic ideas of a
>non-oppressive government is that people must understand the laws.
>Discussing them on Usenet doesn't compare to law schools, but it's better
>than nothing.
But discussing copyright, or having opinions on same, is entirely
different from discussing the legal challenges and responses that
might be made against the GPL.
I have opinions on copyright: we allow too much, and let it run too long.
Those things can be discussed.
But I don't know enough law to make any judgement about the legal
weakness/strength of the GPL. I have seen things here and there that
indicate some who are lawyers think it has serious problems, but
other lawyers are just as quick to refute them. Obviously I
can't weigh in with my comments: nothing I would have to say is
useful in that argument.
--
tony@aplawrence.com Unix/Linux/Mac OS X resources: http://aplawrence.com
Get paid for writing about tech: http://aplawrence.com/publish.html
- Next message: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: "Mad" Tony..."
- Previous message: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: SCO attacks GPL"
- In reply to: Tom Felker: "Re: "Mad" Tony..."
- Next in thread: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: "Mad" Tony..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|