Re: Network File serving options
From: Justin Robbs (justin_robbsNO_at_SPAMhotmail.com)
Date: 10/30/03
- Next message: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: Linux Fan anger"
- Previous message: Joe Dunning: "Re: "Mad" Tony..."
- In reply to: Stuart J. Browne: "Re: Network File serving options"
- Next in thread: Mike Brown: "Re: Network File serving options"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:33:30 -0700
> Given your description, I'd have to say Yes.. NFS is the way to go.
>
> Nothing else would be as invisible to the client machines, requiring much
> more customization.
>
> NFS should be very stable, so long as the server it's self is. I've not
> had any issues with NFS under OSR505 or 506.
>
> bkx
Thanks for the advice. That is about what I figured based on my limited
experience.
Justin
- Next message: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: Linux Fan anger"
- Previous message: Joe Dunning: "Re: "Mad" Tony..."
- In reply to: Stuart J. Browne: "Re: Network File serving options"
- Next in thread: Mike Brown: "Re: Network File serving options"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|