Re: Network File serving options
From: Justin Robbs (justin_robbsNO_at_SPAMhotmail.com)
Date: 10/31/03
- Next message: Mike Brown: "Re: netstat - negative number of queues free"
- Previous message: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: Linux Fan anger"
- In reply to: Bill Vermillion: "Re: Network File serving options"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:28:48 -0700
> Not haveing a published phone number fits the 'security through
> obscurity model' - and that has been shown to be one of the worst
> security mode that anyone tries.
Admittedly, it isn't the most secure method. But the powers that be are
happy with that solution, coupled of course with a strong password.
> Callback modems - if you must use modems - are a good route as they
> will only call back specific phone numbers.
>
--snip--
>
> You invert the funtions of the modems, so that the server modem
> goes on line in originate mode [not answer mode] and you call that
> modem in answer mode.
>
> This means that if anyone dials the number they never get a modem
> tone, as the modem at the server is waiting for the tone. When you
> call the far side you get silence and then your modem issues the
> handshake tone.
>
--snip--
>
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
What other steps could be done to improve the system security, besides those
posted? Nothing to specific, just some general recommendations.
BTW, I didn't mean that security wasn't an issue for the system as a whole,
but for the purposes of this discussion.
Thanks,
Justin
- Next message: Mike Brown: "Re: netstat - negative number of queues free"
- Previous message: tony_at_aplawrence.com: "Re: Linux Fan anger"
- In reply to: Bill Vermillion: "Re: Network File serving options"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|