Re: lfps patch

From: Steve (spete_at_usit.net)
Date: 11/13/03

  • Next message: Jim Sullivan: "Re: A simple opinion of SCO vs. IBM"
    Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 03:28:40 GMT
    
    

    Bela Lubkin wrote:

    > Steve wrote:
    >
    > > Has anybody tried installing this patch recently?
    > >
    > > I downloaded the files a little while ago and attempted to install using
    > > scoadmin software. Partway through the install, an error message came
    > > up reporting one of the modules was corrupt, checksum error. I think
    > > the module was mkdef/fd. I have tried downloading the lspf files again,
    > > but no change.
    > >
    > > Any suggestions?
    >
    > If you mean LFPS, yes, people have installed it. When posting about an
    > error condition, post the _exact_ words (including case and spacing, if
    > at all possible), not a summary like you've given us here. Error
    > messages have lots of specific details that are there to allow a
    > technician to figure out what's wrong. When you leave them out, we're
    > left with little better than to say "yeah, that sounds like a
    > problem..."
    >
    > How are you downloading the files? It's easy to get corruption if your
    > downloader thinks they're text files or does some other sort of
    > conversion. Use a classic FTP tool (e.g. from Windows, the "ftp.exe"
    > program). Tell it to use binary mode. Web browsers are notorious for
    > garbling binary patch data.
    >
    > >Bela<

    Bela,

    Thank you for the reply and sorry for the lack of detail. My posting was an
    afterthought and I did not have the details at hand.

    I downloaded using the SCO Openserver 5.0.7 ftp with prompt set to off and
    type set to I (bin). The error message is as follows:

    These verification errors have occurred.
    The file "./opt/L/SCO/Unix//5.0.7Hw/usr/lib/mkdev/fd" has checksum
    1852926661, expected 1852026533

    And yes, I did mean LFPS.

    Steve P.


  • Next message: Jim Sullivan: "Re: A simple opinion of SCO vs. IBM"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Patch installations fail
      ... scanner is corrupting the download by scanning it while your ... are in the process of downloading and/or installing the patch. ... Also when I attempt to install the Warcraft III frozen throne patch I get the message that it is "unable to authenticate ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.games)
    • Re: Zotob worm patch?
      ... >>> Of course you don't NEED to install the patch. ... You MAY be safe but on ... >> downloading even one Windows Update for the past couple of years. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: Office March Update KB905756 Error #1646/Mary/Gerry
      ... So you downloaded the patch, installed as an Administrator, accepted the ... you try downloading the patch again? ... and click on the links and install from there. ... Chad Harris wrote: ...
      (microsoft.public.office.setup)
    • RE: Cant Install SP1, Why???
      ... ie. error 80070002 when trying to install Windows ... Downloading and installing the so-called "hot fix", ... (which by the way also deletes yiour Windows Update History), ... Free Registry Cleaner, Eusing Free Registry Cleaner. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general)
    • Re: Conflict with Adobe PS4
      ... also have turned that off while downloading and installing, ... "Ernie Lippert" wrote: ... "Gina Whipp" wrote: ... Sounds like your install got hosed. ...
      (microsoft.public.access.setupconfig)