Re: Best Linux version to port from OpenServer 5.0.5/6

From: Kinesin (Kinesin_at_STORMblueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 11/20/03

  • Next message: John DuBois: "Re: expiration of accounts"
    Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:07:15 GMT
    
    

    Justin Robbs wrote:
    > Hello all,
    >
    > We are embarking on a project to port from OpenServer 5.0.5/6, to Linux. I
    > just wanted to get some opinions on which flavor of linux would be the best
    > to port to. First, the background info and requirements.

    I'll just about reached the midway point in my porting project. - which
    has been a piece of piece so far thanks to it mainly depending on
    informix 4gl.

    > We don't need the latest and greatest technology, we just need a stable
    > environment for our Point of Sale system. The benefits of going to linux
    > would be to continue finding any needed drivers and integrating any
    > additional hardware into our system. For example, most of our devices are
    > serial devices, ie. upc scanner, cash drawer, handheld scanner etc. If for
    > some reason they switched to usb, we would be out of luck. The same is true
    > for our receipt printer. We also don't want to be locked into buying the
    > latest version so we can get the driver we need, also if we add more stores,
    > we would like to avoid incurring more licensing charges. I would like to be
    > able to use a basic kernel without a whole lot of extra features.
    >
    > I would like to know which distro would be the easiest port ...

    One that is clean, easy to config, logical and easy to upgrade with the
    tools you need.
    >
    > the most stable ...

    Something that's been around a while and gets lots of testing

    > the best driver support ...
    >
    Petty much any linux here.. it's all about the kernel version

    > the best long term survival chances ...

    One of the bigger player then..
    >
    > the fastest with the smallest footprint ...

    something that doesn install aload of crap you don't need...

    Okay so what fits the bill? We used linux internally for all unix
    services (only our selling product is still on openserver). I've been
    using different flavors for over 6 years and we are completely
    standardised on one singal distro now. -

    D E B I A N

    Debian. Just plain rocks..

    It has 3 versions (stable, testing, Sid(still in dev). Stable is updated
    about every 18-24 months. Security updates are backported to this
    version, and previous stable version are even supported for a good
    while. Once stable is installed you will never have to upgrade anything
    apart from to get security patches... and that is easy.

    # apt-get update && apt-get upgrade

    This can be automagically via cron etc.. the location to pull the
    packages down can be an inhouse server (rather than direct from the
    web.. allowing full control of your updates)

    The package management (apt) allows easy installs of packages (debs),
    which are of a much higher standard that any rpm. If a package needs a
    libary/other package it will get it and install it.. very very simple.
    All packages need man pages.. (see /usr/share/doc/<package name> for
    examples and guides.. (it's a release bug without!)

    It's completely free.. No dropping support for the desktop edition aka
    redhat and forcing the new rent payment approach..
    No about to go bust aka mandrake..
    Oh and it's free as in speech.... Debian will never die!,See the social
    contract for the reasoning behind debian and it's the biggest distro
    with now only 8000 packages ready to download. (stable is currently has
    7CD if you want the whole lot!)

    It's even support directly by HP

    When it comes to admin (every config file is in /etc/xxx), finding
    things is a simple guess! Apache config files /etc/apache, uucp
    /etc/uucp, ipsec stuff /etc/ispec
    All package configuration question information is stored and can be used
    to make clone installs.
    It uses a SYS V style start up directorires /etc/rc2.d /etc/init.d etc
    similar to sco.
    (it doesn't have the 13,000 symlinks tho)
    Upon install it's very very clean and mininal.. base install packages
    are approx 32MB IIRC and business card CD's (150MB) exist with full X
    etc functionally.

    *If you like your OSes tidy and managable, you will even after
    installing other distros end up with debian. Especially if you job is
    Unix/sysadmin!*

    Oh and if your every what to upgrade from one version of debian to the
    next.. it's config file change and:

    # apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade

    This updates the *whole* distro.. and i've used it to without failure
    *every* time. (not even a re-boot!)

    If you have any question.. email me .. no problems
    and if you what to play checkout the hp test-drive program:

    http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/os/linux/

    > The services we use are PPP for our backend connection, although that is
    > probably going to be replaced with a satellite VPN soon. We run apache for
    > a local intranet server (store reports are delivered to the local machine
    > and the management can view them on a windows kiosk in the stores). The
    > rest of the stuff we do is basic serial interface, simple tcp/ip, and file
    > io. Our application runs in between the users and the OS so the GUI is not
    > important. Our interface is currently a character based GUI, but we are
    > replacing it with an x-windows based java front end (management wants it to
    > look prettier).

    All sound fun.. Hope it goes well.

    SteveL
    (clear the weather to reply)


  • Next message: John DuBois: "Re: expiration of accounts"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Debian or Ubuntu Dilemma
      ... Debian Stable < Ubuntu < Debian Testing/Unstable < Any Distro w/mutt packaging ... You'll eventually have to compile a few packages with any distro (from Debian ... Ubuntu seems to be a good balance if its default install does almost ...
      (Debian-User)
    • unsubscribe
      ... > Subject: debian newbie... ... If I need to recompile the kernel, ... Also, what other additional packages, ... >> The package you're trying to install presumably ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: OpenQM vs. Everything Else
      ... people who "support" Linux really only install stock distros. ... Debian is simply not drama queen. ... Linux or that of people like Martin, Doug, or other "engineer" types ... U2, RedHat and SuSE: ...
      (comp.databases.pick)
    • Re: Switching from teTeX to TexLive in Ubuntu
      ... packages everything except: only Dutch language packs; ... using the Debian packages of TL. ... You are using the Ubuntu packages. ... It is a requirement for having different packages being able to install ...
      (comp.text.tex)
    • Re: Question about Viruses on parallels using Windows XP
      ... Everything you will need for your flavor of Linux will come from either the particular Linux OS web server or will be a trusted third party site, like Firefox, etc. ... Debian installs with less intital programs and leaves program choices up to you. ... Debian also installs what it considers a minimal install, so you do not have a lot of programs on your system you do not care for and you can customise Debian to be exactly what you want it to be. ... If you have been reading about Linux distribution you will read a lot about the install... ...
      (comp.sys.mac.system)