Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!
From: FyRE (FyRE_at_toktik.demon.ku.oc.x)
Date: 12/27/03
- Next message: FyRE: "Re: FyRE, I'm Curious About You Too..."
- Previous message: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- In reply to: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Next in thread: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Reply: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 05:44:36 +0000
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 03:31:30 GMT, JamesDad
<mewnewsARROGANCE@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>Have you considered that by your standards, *IBM* and *Red Hat* and *Linus
>Torvalds*, among others, are the enemy? They're not coming out with
>cannons blazing at SCO. They're patiently feeding SCO plenty of rope that
>SCO's execs will eventually hang themselves with. They're playing it cool.
>They *are" cool. You could learn a lot from them.
"Torvalds hits back at SCO" - http://www.vnunet.com/News/1151723
"Redhat sues SCO" - http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=10849
Anyone who thinks IBM are sitting on their hands waiting for SCO to
hang themselves is more than a little naive. In their recent reponses
to SCO's continuing delay tactics, the wording in their documents has
been pretty harsh, bordering on sarcastic.
Maybe I'll have to start posting more of the latest news here so you
don't miss so much, JD.
-- FyRE < "War: The way Americans learn geography" >
- Next message: FyRE: "Re: FyRE, I'm Curious About You Too..."
- Previous message: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- In reply to: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Next in thread: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Reply: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]