Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!
From: Joe Dunning (joe_at_blahblah.invalid)
Date: 12/27/03
- Previous message: FyRE: "Re: FyRE, I'm Curious About You Too..."
- In reply to: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Next in thread: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Reply: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 06:14:55 GMT
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 03:31:30 GMT, JamesDad
<mewnewsARROGANCE@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>
> Joe, I'd appreciate it if you'd go back to the thread I started, "FyRE,
> I'm curious about you, too" and make a reply regarding yourself to the
> questions I asked him. I really would like to know where you're coming
> from and what your goal is in posting here.
>
One of the nice things aobut Usenet is that there is no force compelling
people to reply. I choose not to reply to your questions about my
motives and goals.
I will remark that I am interested by what I percieve as an
inconsistency in your postings. But, whatever: that's your business.
- Previous message: FyRE: "Re: FyRE, I'm Curious About You Too..."
- In reply to: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Next in thread: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Reply: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|