Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!
From: Joe Dunning (joe_at_blahblah.invalid)
Date: 12/27/03
- Next message: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Previous message: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- In reply to: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Next in thread: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Reply: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 19:38:21 GMT
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 19:06:06 GMT, JamesDad
<mewnewsARROGANCE@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 06:14:55 GMT, Joe Dunning <joe@blahblah.invalid>
>wrote:
>In your case I guess I'm stuck with the conclusions I'm drawing from your
>posts; you seem to be little more than a troll whose main purpose is to
>harass people who work (even partially) with SCO's software.
So, if you think I'm a troll, then kill file me! Isn't the best way to
deal with trolls to ignore them?
>There are also mental health issues that could account for your approach,
And you have the gall to accuse me of taking "pot-shots"? That's a
really cheap shot from you.
- Next message: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Previous message: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- In reply to: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Next in thread: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Reply: JamesDad: "Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|