Re: using Sendmail from an non-privileged user

From: bill drescher (nobody_at_Spamcop.net)
Date: 12/28/03 

Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 05:39:48 -0500

Tony Lawrence wrote:
> bill drescher <nobody@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
>>Tony Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>>bill drescher <nobody@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>I have a system that uses /usr/lib/sendmail -t to send messages
>>>>>>generated by a program running on a user account. Works fine.
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Some reason why you aren't just using mail or mutt?
>>>
>>>http://aplawrence.com/SCOFAQ/scotec6.html#mailxmutt
>>>
>>
>>haven't explored mutt as sendmail does the job (usually).
>>I don't think I can send a BCC using mail.
>
>
> You can send anything you like using Mutt.
>
Tony,
Assuming sendmail works as it should (big assumption), would you please
tell me why would I want to install and learn mutt, in addition to my
other responsibilities 

-- 
Bill Drescher
william {at} TechServSys {dot} com

Relevant Pages

  • Re: using blind copy
    ... >It's your MTA, not mutt. ... >NOT transmit a Bcc: header nor its contents. ... In this case, the MTA shouldn't remove any headers, ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • mutt, exim, write_bcc, Bcc: field/header, debian. Resolved.
    ... It relates to the well-known problem in using mutt and exim together. ... When the MUA mutt is used along with the MTA exim, the Bcc field is not ... It may have arisen when debian started ...
    (comp.mail.mutt)
  • Re: Bcc field viewable in Mutt generated e-mails
    ... > I send a message from my work machine running mutt to me@mydomain.com ... > I also bcc that message to me@workdomain.com ... > it with procmail and open it in mutt ... Bcc field viewable in Mutt generated e-mails ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Hiding Recipients Addresses
    ... of each recipient shown on his copy. ... It is not a feature of mutt, but why don't you jaust use BCC:? ... weeks or so, but in all other email packages I have used, the recipient ...
    (comp.mail.mutt)
  • Re: using Sendmail from an non-privileged user
    ... >Tony Lawrence wrote: ... >> Some reason why you aren't just using mail or mutt? ... >I don't think I can send a BCC using mail. ... You can send anything you like using Mutt. ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)