Re: Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!
From: Giulio Orsero (giulioo_at_pobox.com)
Date: 12/29/03
- Previous message: Betan: "Re: [HELP] : I can't install sco 5.0.4 error loading files"
- In reply to: Joe Dunning: "Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:58:41 +0100
joe@blahblah.invalid (Joe Dunning) ha scritto:
>Blake Stowell: No, none of the code in the Linux ABI modules contains
>SCO IP. This code is under the GPL and it re-implements publicly
>documented interfaces. We do not have an issue with the Linux ABI
>modules.
>What are SCO claiming now: that the ABI code in Linux violates SCO's IP.
The term abi is a very general one.
SCO is now discussing about the "general" "unix" abi code in linux
(looking at the headers files, they talk about signals, interfaces,
....).
This has nothing to do with linux-abi. linux-abi has never been part of
any linux kernel (it's a separate patch).
Maybe linux-abi was a unfortunate/too general name for that patch.
-- giulioo@pobox.com
- Previous message: Betan: "Re: [HELP] : I can't install sco 5.0.4 error loading files"
- In reply to: Joe Dunning: "Blake Stowell said Linux ABI is not infringing!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]