Re: SCO: ISPs are blocking our site Blake Stowell
From: John Schmidt (js_at_saltmine.radix.net)
Date: 02/02/04
- Next message: Justin Robbs: "Re: PCI digi board in 5.0.7 (was Re: open command failing on serial port)"
- Previous message: Brian: "Re: No longer supporting Unixware / Open Server"
- In reply to: Bill Vermillion: "Re: SCO: ISPs are blocking our site Blake Stowell"
- Next in thread: Bill Vermillion: "Re: SCO: ISPs are blocking our site Blake Stowell"
- Reply: Bill Vermillion: "Re: SCO: ISPs are blocking our site Blake Stowell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:05:15 -0500
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Bill Vermillion wrote:
> The dump shows that info on that has a 1 hour refresh, and a 15
> minute retry, and if the name server is unreachable the cache is
> valid for 7 days.
Although in this particular instance, those aren't the applicable
fields. Since SCO's nameservers are returning NXDOMAIN for
www.sco.com, the response will only be cached for the value in
the (*horribly* misnamed) "minimum" field.
>From a dig I did a few minutes ago (Mon Feb 2 15:51:41 2004):
sco.com. 1800 IN SOA ns.calderasystems.com.
hostmaster.caldera.com. 2004020105 3600 900 604800 1800
The very last number in the reponse is the "minimum" SOA field,
which is the time in seconds the negative query should be cached.
JS
- Next message: Justin Robbs: "Re: PCI digi board in 5.0.7 (was Re: open command failing on serial port)"
- Previous message: Brian: "Re: No longer supporting Unixware / Open Server"
- In reply to: Bill Vermillion: "Re: SCO: ISPs are blocking our site Blake Stowell"
- Next in thread: Bill Vermillion: "Re: SCO: ISPs are blocking our site Blake Stowell"
- Reply: Bill Vermillion: "Re: SCO: ISPs are blocking our site Blake Stowell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
