Re: Cut him a break
From: Dan Skinner (Jdanskinner_at_jdanskinner.com)
Date: 07/26/04
- Next message: Joe Dunning: "Re: SCO's investors now turn on SCO"
- Previous message: Brian K. White: "Re: Xenix Filesystem"
- In reply to: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Cut him a break"
- Next in thread: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Cut him a break"
- Reply: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Cut him a break"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:39:59 -0500
There is an interesting line that seems to permeate this and similar
threads.
That line is that (and I'll exaggerate for affect) all the SCO systems
that have been running for years without Vendor (SCO) support and all
the newly installed 5.06 and 5.07 systems which are running smoothly will
suddenly fall into disrepair and need extensive support on the day SCO
"goes out of business." IF and when that should happen.
Is that because without this assumption, the fear mongering would be
much less fearful?
Regards...Dan.
- Next message: Joe Dunning: "Re: SCO's investors now turn on SCO"
- Previous message: Brian K. White: "Re: Xenix Filesystem"
- In reply to: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Cut him a break"
- Next in thread: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Cut him a break"
- Reply: Tony Lawrence: "Re: Cut him a break"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|