Re: SCO late in issuing SSL patch. Why?
From: Database Guy (dbguy101_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: Esa Heikkinen: "X and motif"
- Previous message: Lawrence Garvin: "Re: ftp not allowed as 'root' 5.0.6 new install"
- In reply to: M. Leo Cooper: "SCO late in issuing SSL patch. Why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 25 Jan 2005 01:05:36 -0800
"M. Leo Cooper" <thegrendel@NOSPAMtheriver.com> wrote:
> SCO has been quite prompt in issuing "patches" on its legal filings.
> Maybe someone can explain why the lawsuits have a higher priority than
> Unixware and Open Server.
Yes, easy. SCO calculates it can stay afloat months longer if it
concentrates on the lawsuits. Although bankrupt within 2 quarters
tops (unless Microsoft steps in with more cash - unlikely), their
lawyers are nevertheless committed to completing the cases without
further payment.
The software had no future once they had scared away their remaining
customers.
- Next message: Esa Heikkinen: "X and motif"
- Previous message: Lawrence Garvin: "Re: ftp not allowed as 'root' 5.0.6 new install"
- In reply to: M. Leo Cooper: "SCO late in issuing SSL patch. Why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
