Re: network failures
From: Bill Vermillion (bv_at_wjv.com)
Date: 02/20/05
- Next message: peri g: "microlite 2.1 - url resource ftp backup"
- Previous message: Frederico Fonseca: "Re: SCO OSR on MS Virtual PC"
- In reply to: news.nuvox.net: "Re: network failures"
- Next in thread: J.Salfer: "Re: network failures"
- Reply: J.Salfer: "Re: network failures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:35:12 GMT
In article <111eu9pat361993@corp.supernews.com>,
news.nuvox.net <fabiog@venmar.com> wrote:
>
>"J.Salfer" <JohnS@VoyageurSoftware.com> wrote in message
>news:421651af$1_1@newspeer2.tds.net...
>> "Ronald J Marchand" <ron@rojomar.com> wrote in message
>> news:f2e1c$42164df8$42a6716f$28713@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
>>> "J.Salfer" <JohnS@VoyageurSoftware.com> wrote in message
>>> news:42164622$1_1@newspeer2.tds.net...
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Recently our SCO OSR505 box has started having network problems where we
>>>> loose all connections and cannot reconnect. The system is rebooted to
>>>> get
>>>> things working again.
>>>>
>>>> When netstat -m is viewed we have huge failures in class 6 and in this
>>> case
>>>> class 7 lines. We've increased the NSTRPAGES from 1400 to 3500. That
>>> seemed
>>>> to reduce the frequency, but the problem still comes up.
>>>>
>>>> We could keep increasing the value, but I'm wondering what all the
>>>> sudden
>>>> started causing the problem as the system has been stable for 3 years
>>> prior
>>>> to this coming up.
>>>>
>>>> Comments would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> John.
>>>
>>> Had a similar situation with 5.0.6 and a 3Com card. Worked well when
>>> installed. Over time the number of connections and the traffic on the
>>> system increased. Replaced the card with an Intel Pro 1000 and all has
>>> been
>>> well since.
>>>
>>> Ron
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Interesting. The machine has an Intel Pro100 on-board NIC that we disabled
>> to installed a 3Com early in our troubleshooting. Our switch was stating
>> we were having a low number of bad packets being sent out and we thought
>> maybe the problems were related. The hang problem continued though and it
>> brought us to find the failures and that increasing NSTRPAGES helped some.
>> Makes me wonder if I should switch back to the on-board card.
>>
>> We increased NSTRPAGES to 8000 for now to see if it'll resolve the issue.
>> I think I should still find something to monitor incoming
>> packets. Thinking that maybe something on the network has
>> starting hitting the system being the problem came up out of
>> the blue.
>> Anyone know of a good program? So far I've come across nmap,
>> tcpdump, snoop and etherfind, but I'm not familiar with any of
>> them so I don't know if one is better than the other.
>> John.
>May or may not be an issue, but in the past, letting both the
>card and the switch auto-negotiate speed and duplex has caused
>problems. Hard coding both (or just one if you can't do both) to
>the appropriate settings (i.e 100Mbs/full-duplex) might help.
Actually you have to let both auto-negotiate. If auto-negotiation
fails you will find it defaulting to a mode which is usually not
good.
For a very good discussion on how things can go wrong and examples
of different settings, see this link.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html
It also points out that major problems occur when some vendors
decided to add enhancements that aren't correctly specified.
It's a longish document - but it is very good.
Bill
-- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
- Next message: peri g: "microlite 2.1 - url resource ftp backup"
- Previous message: Frederico Fonseca: "Re: SCO OSR on MS Virtual PC"
- In reply to: news.nuvox.net: "Re: network failures"
- Next in thread: J.Salfer: "Re: network failures"
- Reply: J.Salfer: "Re: network failures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|