Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL
From: pablo hernandez (pablo_at_crecat.com)
Date: 05/23/05
- Next message: Jean-Pierre Radley: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Previous message: John DuBois: "Re: MMDF dropping domain name"
- In reply to: Mainak Yajnik: "SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Next in thread: Jean-Pierre Radley: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Reply: Jean-Pierre Radley: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 23 May 2005 13:28:26 -0700
"Mainak Yajnik" <yajnikmp@gmail.com> wrote in message news:<1116860194.547203.244810@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...
> Dear Group:
>
> In my last thread I was unable to configure the box acting as router.
> Well with the groups help I was able to do the needful.
>
> A special Thanx to Mr. Tony (aplawrance.com) & JP for helping me achive
> my target.
>
> Apprently I found my server is accessible from Internet and is security
> hazard for my organisation.
>
> I want to block Telnet on the server. I have already configured SSH and
> is working fine.
>
> I also want to have the server to give me secure ftp login.
>
> My current Security setting of SCO box is set to Traditional.
>
>
> Mainak
In my opinion is better to install a hardware firewall like zysell on
the WAN side , then is easy to configure it to only access some
services.
- Next message: Jean-Pierre Radley: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Previous message: John DuBois: "Re: MMDF dropping domain name"
- In reply to: Mainak Yajnik: "SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Next in thread: Jean-Pierre Radley: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Reply: Jean-Pierre Radley: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
