Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL
From: Jean-Pierre Radley (jpr_at_jpr.com)
Date: 05/23/05
- Previous message: pablo hernandez: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- In reply to: pablo hernandez: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Next in thread: Mainak Yajnik: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Reply: Mainak Yajnik: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Reply: pablo hernandez: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 23 May 2005 16:58:41 -0400
pablo hernandez typed (on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:28:26PM -0700):
| "Mainak Yajnik" <yajnikmp@gmail.com> wrote in message news:<1116860194.547203.244810@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...
| > Dear Group:
| >
| > In my last thread I was unable to configure the box acting as router.
| > Well with the groups help I was able to do the needful.
| >
| > A special Thanx to Mr. Tony (aplawrance.com) & JP for helping me achive
| > my target.
| >
| > Apprently I found my server is accessible from Internet and is security
| > hazard for my organisation.
| >
| > I want to block Telnet on the server. I have already configured SSH and
| > is working fine.
| >
| > I also want to have the server to give me secure ftp login.
| >
| > My current Security setting of SCO box is set to Traditional.
| >
| >
| > Mainak
|
| In my opinion is better to install a hardware firewall like zysell on
| the WAN side , then is easy to configure it to only access some
| services.
Why is it any harder than doing it with ipf?
-- JP
- Previous message: pablo hernandez: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- In reply to: pablo hernandez: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Next in thread: Mainak Yajnik: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Reply: Mainak Yajnik: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Reply: pablo hernandez: "Re: SCO 5.0.7 AS FIREWALL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
