Re: "Test Driving Linux" Released by O'Reilly
brian_at_aljex.com
Date: 05/30/05
- Next message: didds: "newbie ,mmdf problems...."
- Previous message: Mainak Yajnik: "COMPARISION BETWEEN IBM AS 400 & INTEL BASED UNIX SERVERS"
- In reply to: Ed Hew: "Re: "Test Driving Linux" Released by O'Reilly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 May 2005 11:46:33 -0700
Look,
I complained in one post,
received facts i had no way to know before (months of posts backlogged
in a server suddenly being released all at once) and other facts that
were not obvious to me, however admittedly my own fault that was,
making this into a simple misunderstanding,
and in the very next and only other until now post apologized for and
retracted the complaint and explained my part in the misunderstanding.
Of course I know all the ways to read/filter/store/organize newsgroup
posts and yes, In fact I do have my reasons for reading them the way I
was/am. That is all beside the point. It was just a simple
misuderstanding and my only point in my 2nd post was to explain how I
came to write the first one. An apology with no explaination seems
somehow incomplete or maybe insincere or impolite or something.
I hold no special hate for Kathryn and don't need a lecture on
mail/news clients.
- Next message: didds: "newbie ,mmdf problems...."
- Previous message: Mainak Yajnik: "COMPARISION BETWEEN IBM AS 400 & INTEL BASED UNIX SERVERS"
- In reply to: Ed Hew: "Re: "Test Driving Linux" Released by O'Reilly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|