Re: Need opinion on Dell vs. HP on SCO 5.0.7

From: Brian K. White (brian_at_aljex.com)
Date: 07/12/05

  • Next message: John Schmidt: "Re: Need opinion on Dell vs. HP on SCO 5.0.7"
    Date: 11 Jul 2005 18:33:44 -0400
    
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Mark" <mraho@inland-av.com>
    Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc
    To: <distro@jpr.com>
    Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 4:45 PM
    Subject: Need opinion on Dell vs. HP on SCO 5.0.7

    > Hello,
    >
    > We are currently running SCO-Unix Openserver 5.0.5 on an old Proliant
    > server. It's been rock solid for 8 yrs. We are looking to purchase a new
    > server to run 5.0.7., and I'm just trying to get opinions as to what is
    > the
    > best server. Specifically, looking at a Proliant ML350 G4 vs. a PowerEdge
    > 2800. Also looking at an (expensive!) IBM xSeries 226. Any thoughts or
    > experiences with these manufacturers, and what would you recommend?
    > Thanks
    > all!

    I generally don't like proprietary boxes and their proprietary drivers & OS
    patches & hardware.
    One of my current problem cases is a recently installed ML380g4 and the
    unexpected little compatibility surprises with it's built in raid card and a
    tape drive and the osr5 driver & only the osr5 driver, tape drives are
    supported on the same hardware on other os's, might be ok on osr5 too even
    if not advertised, but we may still have some other kind of typical scsi
    problem like termination or mismatched settings between the bios and the
    drives jumpers. While installing that box I needed, *needed*, a floppy drive
    because that was the only way to load a btld needed for the raid card. The
    floppy wasn't in it, and because of the proprietary connectors inside, it
    was impossible for me to even temporarily jury-rig a loose floppy, let alone
    install it. I actually had to order the special floppy from HP and wait for
    it to arrive via shipping before I could proceed to install the box! That
    kind of thing in intolerable to me. But that's me and maybe only just me.
    When the special floppy did arrive, it dropped in place absolutely
    effortlessly, not so much as a thumb-screw. it had a short stiff little
    ribbon cable sticking out the back, and when the drive is popped into it's
    slot, the connector on the cable gets push into it's mate in the server
    perfectly firmly and perfectly lined-up with no need for me to think or be
    careful or have any skill at all with handling things like this. Your
    grandmother could install the floppy drive on the first try without asking
    for any help. I'm sure for some people that is valuable enough to offset the
    type of annoyance I described that comes with dealing with anything
    proprietary.

    These days I get sco boxes from Seneca Data.
    Then again, the only support I want or need is good warranties on the
    hardware, which Seneca offers and makes good on it with no fuss,
    and I want someone else to do the work of vetting hardware combinations for
    compatibility and reliability, which Seneca does quite well. They have some
    pretty good guys doing the assembly and testing and os loading.

    If Dell or Compaq offer support for installing/configuring/maintaining the
    OS, and you want that, then I'd go with the Compaq.
    If you want that kind of support but don't care who provides it so long as
    it's good then I highly recommend a combination of a white-box from Seneca
    www.senecadata.com (Ask for Carolyn Schmauder and say Brian from Aljex sent
    you. You won't get a special discount, nor will I, but what the heck :) and
    pick anyone from the consultants list on Tony Lawrences site www.pcunix.com
    for support or to augment your own.

    Brian K. White -- brian@aljex.com -- http://www.aljex.com/bkw/
    +++++[>+++[>+++++>+++++++<<-]<-]>>+.>.+++++.+++++++.-.[>+<---]>++.
    filePro BBx Linux SCO FreeBSD #callahans Satriani Filk!


  • Next message: John Schmidt: "Re: Need opinion on Dell vs. HP on SCO 5.0.7"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: IBM 5.25 fdd
      ... No switch on the side.and it is a 5.25 FDD. ... the floppy is mechanically ejected. ... 2.88MB drive size for it to even be POSSIBLE to support the Electronic ... Most support the EHD drives in the BIOS, so it has to be a variant ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware)
    • Re: Unable to load Intel RAID drivers from floppy drive on Asus P5B-E
      ... I set up the hard drives as IDEs, although they are connected by SATA ... install the RAID drivers behind the OS's back, ... Windows and pressing F6, then S, to install third-party RAID drivers. ... When I use the motherboard's CD to make a floppy disk with the drivers ...
      (alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus)
    • Re: Installing SBS with Raid 5
      ... A USB floppy drive *might* work if you had one. ... without some kind of driver already on there. ... Poweredge 2850 SBS2003 install ... and SBS is saying it doesn't see any hard drives! ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Installing SBS with Raid 5
      ... page for Windows 2003 and SBS 2003, the potential requirement for a floppy ... of device-specific software during the Windows Server install process. ... When I try to install SBS, ... "Setup did not find any hard drisk drives installed in your computer." ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Floppy stopped working: Could this mean a boot sector virus?
      ... if your floppy is not working or you cant figure out how to get it to work, ... i believe that win ME was the first OS to boot directly off a CD. ... Now that I discover that the floppy wont work at the end of the cable which is provided for it to be connected to the parallel port, I am trying to move on from that point to discover both how to install the OS onto what I would like to be a blank hard drive and why the floppy drive wont work in the bay. ... The only other oddity is that all the drives show to be working in DOS compatibility mode??? ...
      (alt.sys.pc-clone.dell)