Re: I despise the new "hw" command in OSR6
- From: Bela Lubkin <filbo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 May 2006 15:01:54 -0400
"XeniXman" wrote:
Bela Lubkin wrote:
I suppose I should remind everyone (myself included) that I don't work
for SCO any more. I have no influence over this stuff. You want SCO to
produce a working old-fashioned `hwconfig` for OSR6? You'll have to
raise it through appropriate support channels to get a real response...
I didn't mean to imply that any of this was your personal
responsibility.
I didn't take it that way. But I didn't want you to infer that because
you had posted this stuff here, SCO was going to act on it. Most of
all, I don't want to get a private contact from SCO asking me to stop
helping people here because they don't like the impression people might
get that I am somehow speaking for them. (No, I haven't gotten any hint
of that from SCO... just want to keep it that way.)
Bela<.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I despise the new "hw" command in OSR6
- From: Carl
- Re: I despise the new "hw" command in OSR6
- References:
- I despise the new "hw" command in OSR6
- From: XeniXman
- Re: I despise the new "hw" command in OSR6
- From: XeniXman
- I despise the new "hw" command in OSR6
- Prev by Date: Re: I despise the new "hw" command in OSR6
- Next by Date: Re: Runaway processes in OSR6
- Previous by thread: Re: I despise the new "hw" command in OSR6
- Next by thread: Re: I despise the new "hw" command in OSR6
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
